๐๐ผ๐ต๐ป ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ ๐ป๐ฎ๐ถ๐น๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ถ๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ญ๐ต๐ต๐ญ: "๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ฎ ๐๐ฎ๐น๐ฒ๐ป๐. ๐๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฎ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด."
- candyandgrim

- Feb 16
- 1 min read

He argued it's about slipping into playful "๐ฐ๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ฆ" relaxed pondering, silly doodles, embracing uncertainty, lingering in ambiguity until unexpected connections spark. Humour, he said, flips us into this mode quicker than anything elseโyet fear of mistakes shuts it down fastest.
๐๐ป ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฒ, ๐ด๐ฒ๐ป-๐๐ ๐๐ฒ๐บ๐ฝ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ป ๐ฒ๐er ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐ถ๐ป๐๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ฝ๐ผ๐น๐ถ๐๐ต: dev-fast, pattern-perfect, no discomfort required. Brilliant for closed-mode execution, but what happens when we shortcut the messy incubation, the hands-dirty hesitation, the childlike play that births true originality? Brain research (e.g., MIT Media Lab's 2025 EEG preprint on ChatGPT essay writing) points to "cognitive debt": weaker neural connectivity, lower engagement in memory/attention areas, reduced ownership, flatter outputs.
The hopeful bit? That open-mode fugue isn't lostโit's retrainable. Neuroplasticity lets us rekindle it with deliberate, tactile habits that rebuild tolerance for ambiguity and spark fresh links.
A few daily tricks that work for me (deeper dive in the article)
Cleese would chuckle: play isn't lazyโit's essential. Organisations (and now AI tools) often punish pondering as inefficiency; guard those playful pockets, use AI as accelerator not crutch, and we stay irreplaceable.
What's one small ritual you protect (or want to start) to keep 'open mode' alive in this AI age? Share belowโlet's compare notes. ๐




Comments