top of page

๐—๐—ผ๐—ต๐—ป ๐—–๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿต๐Ÿต๐Ÿญ: "๐—–๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ฎ ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜. ๐—œ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด."

  • Writer: candyandgrim
    candyandgrim
  • Feb 16
  • 1 min read

He argued it's about slipping into playful "๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ" relaxed pondering, silly doodles, embracing uncertainty, lingering in ambiguity until unexpected connections spark. Humour, he said, flips us into this mode quicker than anything elseโ€”yet fear of mistakes shuts it down fastest.



๐—œ๐—ป ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฒ, ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป-๐—”๐—œ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒer ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ต: dev-fast, pattern-perfect, no discomfort required. Brilliant for closed-mode execution, but what happens when we shortcut the messy incubation, the hands-dirty hesitation, the childlike play that births true originality? Brain research (e.g., MIT Media Lab's 2025 EEG preprint on ChatGPT essay writing) points to "cognitive debt": weaker neural connectivity, lower engagement in memory/attention areas, reduced ownership, flatter outputs.



The hopeful bit? That open-mode fugue isn't lostโ€”it's retrainable. Neuroplasticity lets us rekindle it with deliberate, tactile habits that rebuild tolerance for ambiguity and spark fresh links.



A few daily tricks that work for me (deeper dive in the article)



Cleese would chuckle: play isn't lazyโ€”it's essential. Organisations (and now AI tools) often punish pondering as inefficiency; guard those playful pockets, use AI as accelerator not crutch, and we stay irreplaceable.



What's one small ritual you protect (or want to start) to keep 'open mode' alive in this AI age? Share belowโ€”let's compare notes. ๐Ÿ˜Š

ย 
ย 
ย 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page