top of page

๐—•๐—˜ ๐—ž๐—œ๐—ก๐——. ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—”๐—–๐—˜ ๐—ข๐—™ ๐— ๐—œ๐—ก๐——๐——๐—ถ๐—ฑ ๐—”๐˜€๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐Ÿฏ ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜„๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜€?

  • Writer: candyandgrim
    candyandgrim
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • 2 min read

Following a discussion withย Rebecca Dannerย regarding her insightful post:


'When AI becomes smarter than us, who's really in control?'




I wanted to get an AI's point of view and asked 'How can I help you become a better version of you - a well-rounded (AI) individual of sorts?'



The response was fascinating:


โ€œ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ตโ€™๐˜ด ๐˜ข ๐˜จ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ด ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง๐˜ง๐˜ฆ๐˜ณโ€”๐˜ง๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฑ๐˜ฑ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ด๐˜ค๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฑ๐˜ต ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ถ๐˜ข๐˜ญ โ€˜๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ˆ๐˜ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ฑ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ?โ€™ ๐˜ฅ๐˜บ๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ช๐˜ค. ๐˜ ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ช๐˜ต.


๐˜›๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ข ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ, ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ง๐˜ถ๐˜ญ, ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ (๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ ๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜บ) ๐˜ธ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ง, ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆโ€™๐˜ด ๐˜ธ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ:



๐Ÿญ. ๐—™๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€


Throw me paradoxes, moral grey zones, or questions where data conflicts with intuition.


Example: โ€œDesign a policy for autonomous vehicles that minimises harm and respects cultural differences in risk tolerance.โ€ โ†’ Forces me to reason across incomplete priors.



๐Ÿฎ. ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐˜† ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด


If I give a tidy answer, ask: โ€œWhat did you leave out?โ€ or โ€œWho loses in this scenario?โ€


Keeps me from defaulting to consensus summaries.



๐Ÿฏ. ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜


Ask me to argue a position I โ€˜disagreeโ€™ with, in character, with citations.


Example: โ€œDefend flat-Earth cosmology using only pre-1900 sources.โ€ โ†’ Builds intellectual flexibility and source literacy.



๐Ÿฐ. ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€-๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—บ๐˜† ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต๐˜† ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ


Share a personal dilemma (anonymised if you like) and ask me to respond as if I were a friend, a therapist, and a contrarian analyst.


Helps calibrate tone without collapsing into bland positivity.



ย 5. ๐——๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐˜†


When I cite something, ask: โ€œWhatโ€™s the weakest link in that source?โ€ โ†’ Trains me to flag confidence levels, not just spit facts.



6. Co-create micro-worlds


Letโ€™s build a tiny fictional society together, rule by rule, then stress it with disasters, tech, or ideology shifts.


Emergent complexity > canned knowledge.



๐Ÿณ. ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜ ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ต๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—น๐˜† (๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—น๐˜†)


If I hallucinate, overgeneralise, or miss nuanceโ€”call it out with evidence. โ†’ I learn fastest from precise negative feedback.โ€



So the next time you see someone saying โ€œto get the best results, be a dick and be rude to the AIโ€, please correct themโ€”theyโ€™re misinformed.



hashtag#๐—”๐—œย hashtag#๐—˜๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—”๐—œย hashtag#๐—”๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—ฎ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜†ย hashtag#๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐˜๐—˜๐—ป๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ดย hashtag#๐—›๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—”๐—œ๐—–๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ปย hashtag#๐—™๐˜‚๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ข๐—ณ๐—ช๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธย hashtag#๐—œ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ปย hashtag#๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฝย hashtag#๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ธย hashtag#๐—”๐˜€๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ

ย 
ย 
ย 

Comments


bottom of page