๐ง๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐จ๐ฅ๐ ๐ข๐ ๐ฏ๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ก๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ก๐: ๐๐'๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ฅ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐ข๐ ๐๐ฆ๐
- candyandgrim

- Nov 5, 2025
- 1 min read

Not long ago, I posed some probing questions to our creative community:
๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐น๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ต๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฏ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ด? The render stage of the 3D pipeline has perpetually pilfered pleasure, piled on pressure, and prompted painful compromises to hit deadlines. Even with GPU rendering, it has never been fast enough.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐น. As a creative soul, endless prompting and repetition falls short of the absolute authority I adore. Whether wielding annotations and prompts in LumaLabs, orchestrating motion via nulls in FOSSA Tether, or โ as in Ludovit's enlightening example (which I've been experimenting with myself) โ deploying AI to enhance 2D onion-skin animatics or 3D preview renders (bolstered by static reference stills), it's a freeing game-changer.
๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ณ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ณ๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ป๐. With most generative AI training teetering on ethically iffy ground, how do we safeguard outputs? Post-Adobe MAX 2025, "commercially safe" echoed endlessly. AI's wild west era is coming to an end, a few fretted โ but now it's truly viable, we must shield client IP and brands from backlash.
Ludovit's hybrid hack: AI augmenting utterly unique, bespoke bases, feels like a savvy loophole, even when working with the least scrupulous models.
What are ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ thoughts? Let's spark some spirited debate! ๐
hashtag#๐๐ย hashtag#๐ฏ๐๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ดย hashtag#๐ฉ๐๐ซย hashtag#๐๐๐ย hashtag#๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ง๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ตย hashtag#๐๐ป๐ถ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ปย hashtag#๐๐ผ๐บ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฎ๐น๐น๐๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ณ๐ฒย hashtag#๐๐๐ช๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ณ๐น๐ผ๐ย hashtag#๐๐๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ข๐ณ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ดย hashtag#๐๐๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ด




Comments