๐ง๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐จ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐๐๐ข๐ก๐๐ฆ ๐ง๐ข ๐ง๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฆ๐ง (๐'๐๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐)
- candyandgrim

- Feb 5
- 2 min read
๐ช๐ต๐ ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ณ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ ๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐น๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฒ ๐ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ
Michelle Higa Fox's recent article 'It's Nice That' hit different. Not because it revealed something new, but because it's refreshing to know there are others who share this outlook. The future belongs to the generalist.
For 20 years, I've heard "๐ซ๐ข๐ค๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ ๐ต๐ณ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ด ๐ช๐ด ๐ข ๐ฎ๐ข๐ด๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฆ"โusually with a disapproving tone. What they're missing is the full quote: "๐ ๐ซ๐ข๐ค๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ ๐ต๐ณ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ด ๐ช๐ด ๐ข ๐ฎ๐ข๐ด๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฆ, ๐ฃ๐ถ๐ต ๐ฐ๐ง๐ต๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต๐ช๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ด ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ต๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ฎ๐ข๐ด๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฆ."

๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐น๐น๐ถ๐ผ๐ป
Late teens, reading Asimov's Foundation and Day of the Triffids. Foundation showed how overspecialization led to societal collapse. Coker in Day of the Triffids introduced parallel learning: developing multiple competencies simultaneously rather than linear progression in one field.
Then came GCSEs and A-levels. Pick subjects you've never tried. Commit to a narrow path. Specialize at university. Specialize again in your career.
It felt backwards. Why narrow before you've experienced the options?
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ซ๐ฒ๐ป๐ป๐ถ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐๐ฎ๐ป๐๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ
I'm a Xennialโborn between Gen X and Millennials. My formative years: Teletext, 4 TV channels, VCR, floppy disks. By adulthood: Web 2.0, mobile phones, MP3s, digital everything.
Constant adaptation. Learning to integrate old and new systems, analog and digital thinking. That forced adaptability became a superpower.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ผ๐น๐๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ต ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฟ
I refused to pick one thing. Motion graphics, 3D CGI, brand systems, emerging tech across agency work, fintech, Web3, automotive, AI events.
Career advisors said: "Pick one thing and be the best at it." The implication was always there: scattered, unfocused, uncommitted.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป
Michelle's article. Buck's 2026 predictions about AI-augmented generalists. The pattern is clear:
Specialists doing one thing deeply are most vulnerable to AI automation. Generalists who understand systems, integration, and how things connectโthey're the ones AI elevates rather than replaces.
Integration is the new specialization.
๐๐น๐ผ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐ด๐ต๐
The polymaths, generalists, renaissance thinkers, Swiss Army knivesโwe're the ones best positioned for the AI era. Not because we're smarter, but because adopting gen-AI doesn't feel like a massive leap for us.
It's just another day. Another system to integrate. Another bridge to build between old and new.
Turns out, we weren't scattered. We were just early.




Comments