๐๐๐ข๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ง ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐จ๐ก๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ง๐ฆ ๐๐ข๐ฅ ๐๐ ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐ข ๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ
- candyandgrim

- Jan 8
- 1 min read

Their second "unlimited generations" promo in two monthsโbut this time they quietly removed an entire subscription tier from eligibility.
This isn't about Adobe making a mistake. It's a symptom of a much bigger industry pattern.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐น๐ผ๐๐ฑ-๐ณ๐ถ๐ฟ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น ๐ถ๐ ๐ต๐ถ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐บ๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐. When platforms need back-to-back unlimited promos, it signals that compute costs vs. creative demand weren't properly modelled. This is happening across the industryโAdobe's just the most visible example right now.
But here's what the data is really showing us: the hardware economics don't add up.
Creative teams are running ยฃ5-8k pro laptops and desktops that sit at 15% utilisation while paying monthly for cloud credits. We're rendering locally for C4D and Redshift but sending simple image generation to external servers.
The industry is optimising for the Build layer (developer infrastructure) when creatives actually need hybrid workflows that leverage local compute we've already purchased.
ComfyUI, Stable Diffusion, local LLMsโthese tools are maturing into professional-grade alternatives that respect both hardware investments and operational budgets.
The credit fragmentation problem (separate buckets for Midjourney, Runway, Adobe, Stability) is real. But the structural issue is deeper: ๐๐ฒ'๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฝ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐๐๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐น๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ ๐ผ๐๐ป.
๐ค๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ ๐น๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐: What percentage of your team's compute capacity is actually being utilised in your AI workflows?




Comments